Which statement is true about the benefits of a self-hosted option over a hosted one?

The statement regarding lower ongoing costs as a benefit of a self-hosted option is grounded in the understanding that, typically, self-hosted solutions involve a one-time setup cost or hardware investment. Once the infrastructure is established, the ongoing operational expenses can be lower compared to subscription fees that come with hosted services.

With a hosted solution, costs can accrue significantly over time, especially as usage scales up or as additional features are added. In a self-hosted environment, organizations may save on recurring fees, focusing expenditures primarily on initial setup, maintenance, and scaling as needed.

In contrast, aspects like better scalability, access to a wider range of features, or enhanced user community support are often seen more in hosted solutions, where the provider manages resources and updates in real-time, providing users straightforward access to the latest features with minimal user intervention. Therefore, while self-hosting has various advantages, when focusing purely on ongoing financial implications, self-hosted solutions can indeed lead to lower costs in the long run.