Which of the following is NOT a reason organizations adopt a structured SDLC?

Organizations adopt a structured Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) for several compelling reasons, including improving software quality, lowering production costs, and shortening the time to delivery. Each of these factors contributes to a more efficient and effective software development process.

Improving software quality is a primary goal of a structured SDLC, as it mandates standardized practices, reviews, and testing at various stages. This structured approach helps teams identify issues early in the development cycle, leading to a more stable final product.

Lowering production costs is another significant advantage of a structured SDLC. By following a defined process, organizations can streamline workflows, reduce rework, and use resources more efficiently, ultimately resulting in cost savings.

Shortening time to delivery is also an objective tied to a structured approach. By adhering to a well-defined roadmap with clear milestones and deliverables, teams can monitor progress effectively and reduce delays, which enhances their ability to meet deadlines.

In contrast, the notion that a structured SDLC would decrease the number of Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) needed is not typically a reason organizations adopt this methodology. While implementing a more efficient process might optimize resource allocation, it does not inherently lead to a reduction in staffing levels. Often, a structured SDLC requires