What is one disadvantage of a self-hosted monitoring tool compared to its managed equivalent?

A self-hosted monitoring tool indeed requires higher ongoing maintenance responsibilities, which is a significant disadvantage compared to its managed equivalent. In a self-hosted setup, the organization must handle all aspects of the software lifecycle, including installation, updates, and infrastructure management, directly. This can require substantial time, technical expertise, and resources to ensure that the monitoring system runs efficiently and securely.

In contrast, a managed monitoring solution typically offloads these responsibilities to the service provider, allowing organizations to focus more on utilizing the data and insights generated rather than managing the infrastructure behind it. This means that while self-hosted tools can offer benefits such as increased control and customization, they also place a continuous burden on the team managing them, which can lead to inefficiencies and resource drains.