What is a negative consequence of using an open source monitoring tool?

Using an open source monitoring tool often requires significant engineering effort for setup, configuration, and ongoing maintenance. This can lead to wasted engineering time as teams may need to invest extensive resources in integrating the tool, customizing it to fit their specific needs, and troubleshooting any issues that arise. Unlike commercial tools that may provide easier setup processes and user-friendly interfaces, open source solutions can necessitate a deeper understanding of the system and more hands-on work from developers and engineers.

While other options may present valid challenges associated with different types of software, they do not typically align with the primary concerns regarding open source tools. For instance, high licensing fees are not a characteristic of open source tools since they are generally free to use, and vendor lock-in is usually associated with proprietary solutions rather than open source. Similarly, while complexity of use is a consideration, it is often the time investment required for initial setup and ongoing management that poses a more immediate and practical challenge for organizations adopting open source monitoring solutions.